2009-02-25 15:09:42
I’ve had a terrific time covering the South American clay swing this season, and if it were up to me, every single tennis match, professional and otherwise, would be played on clay. Ah yes, doing away with the sleep-inducing serving contests turned in by the quasi-catatonic ball machines of the 1990's sounds like beautiful music to my ears.
Before I begin, I promised my gal pal- she was lucky enough to travel the circuit for the first three stops on The Swing- I’d give a proper shout to the tournament officials who worked their magic at the Copa Telmex. She told me how wonderful they were, how much fun the event was and how friendly the people were to her throughout her stay in Buenos Aires. Speaking on behalf of my satisfied tour bunny bud, thank you Argentina!
Now, onto the blog business at hand....
I received two interesting emails last week. The first was sent in by a guy who recognized my name from a recent promotional stint I completed for a sports entertainment company, the second from a girl struggling with her own feelings of hypocrisy and confusion regarding the amount of compensation male and female tennis players receive.
I thought it best to divide my reply into two separate entries- as both queries deserve adequate attention and respect- rather than combining them within a single blog post.
The guy asked a provocative question about the possible presence of performance-enhancing drugs in professional tennis, and considering my background and work experience, wondered if I approved of their usage. I pondered his question for a long while, eventually enlisting the help of one of my long-suffering mentors, once a major creative force behind the direction and development of the wildly successful (now defunct) WCW.
Wrestling performers, many of them underachievers unable to make the grade within the realm of traditional sports, are promoted and marketed as a direct result of their physicality. The talent is promoted and “pushed” if and when they encompass that overblown, overstuffed, hyper-masculine muscular stereotype. The bigger the biceps, the bigger the paycheck. Simple as that. Unlike the athletes who play for the NBA, the NFL, MLB and the ATP, wrestlers are- although those in power are always careful to keep it hush-hush at all times- almost expected and required to achieve an impossible look by any means necessary.
I have a number of active contacts- many still earning a respectable payday working independent shows- who will admit to using. They fully acknowledge the risks that dangerous performance-enhancing drugs pose after prolonged abuse, but go on about the task of entertaining crowds in arenas, theaters and other types of venues all over the country. They are well aware of the legal and health-related consequences, but continue to live life on their own terms.
Do I approve?
First and foremost, I’d be a hypocrite if I neglected to mention my own reckless pursuit of the body beautiful. In 2007, as two-fold preparation for a local figure (not to be confused with the more well-known fitness) competition and a small role in an indie film I shot in Chicago, I started taking a highly concentrated, ephedra-based herbal supplement called Thermogenic Heat.
Shortly after I began taking it, I noticed fairly significant changes in my physique- I’m a natural-born ruler shape- skinny, wiry, undersized- and always lacking the necessary muscle development and symmetry to ever mount a serious campaign in a figure contest. In about eight weeks, after combining the product with a strict diet and grueling exercise program, I added 10 pounds to my frame.
My new muscles came with a laundry list of undesirable side effects- insomnia, profuse sweating, tremors, changes in skin condition and mood disturbance. In the end, I failed to place in the contest and half of the scenes I filmed in the movie ended up on the cutting room floor.
Tale told, I was, and still am on occasion, lucky enough to make money working for several entertainment-driven sports companies. Along the way, as I take part in the events from time to time, I’ve enjoyed the companionship of some really great people. Sure, most resemble ridiculous comic book characters- bulging, bronzed and baby oiled- barely able to keep the seams of their spandex from splitting, but I count a handful of them among my closest and most loyal friends.
With respect to the men I know, their livelihood dependent upon what they look like, while operating within the boundaries of the business of entertainment, not sport, I respect a performer’s right to choose.
Legitimate professional sport, on the other hand, is an entirely different animal.
From the latest installment in the A-Rod saga to ongoing speculation in the world of professional cycling, whispers about banned substances and their users have permeated the news forever.
Tennis has weathered a storm of its own over the last generation, a host of players finding themselves on a semipermanent vacation from the ATP for knowingly- or not, depending- ingesting an ITF tagged no-no. Argentine tennis players, for example, endured multiple instances of doping scandals in the last decade, several offering little or no explanation as to why chemical x, y and/or z showed up on a drop spec sheet.
The World Anti-Doping agency- WADA for short- has come under fire recently, demanding players in the top 50 assign one hour daily to dope testing. If WADA caught the ATP in their crosshairs because tennis became an Olympic sport, fine. Not so fine, however, is the proposed plan to implement their stipulations. Dispensing with the usual long-winded debate, outspoken players like World No. 1 Rafael Nadal, World No. 4 Andy Murray and World No. 8 Gilles Simon labeled the testing protocol unfair, unrealistic and impractical. I agree.
As to the original question my emailer posed to me, my answer is an emphatic NO. Cutting corners in tennis is wrong. Circumventing the rules is wrong. Violating an unspoken code of conduct and fair play is wrong.
Future success in tennis- or any other traditional sport for that matter- hinges upon an amalgam of god-given ability, skill and talent, coupled with an intense desire to work hard. No type of chemical trickery, whether concocted in a laboratory or purchased on the city streets, can bridge the divide between a player who possesses the tools to succeed and a player who does not.
Tell a friend »
"Quasu-Catatonic" Ball machines. Excuse me, but isn't possessing a skilled big serve (players had better serves then than now) like possessing a "tool to succeed"? And why do so many of the South American circuit players struggle on other surfaces? Why do the top players opt for the hard court swing, Nadal included?
samprallica , 2/25/09 4:14 PM
you should of named names in this one. don't protect them argie basters next time, they got the most people busted!!
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 4:36 PM
big servers killed tennis sampretardillica get over it. nadal plays on hards because he can do well there, the rest of them clay clowns can't.
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 4:59 PM
if you was playin for teh wta, you'd have been banned yourself ya know! lolol
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 5:22 PM
Samprallica and the fair trixxy cause trouble wherever they are, dear. LOL. The post above is one for the ages, I will give him that.
Terribly dangerous indeed to partake in taking these things, and quite unfair of an advantage as well. Wada is utter madness, but when found out I'd say the players would do well to have their suspensions made longer.
I shall leave the second paragraph alone, for I want no part of it. You will pardon me if I secretly wish she had been thrown out of Chile at holiday's start.
RocketQueen , 2/25/09 6:24 PM
yea sure rocketwench i always do just what ya said. not on me that volandri and monaco got suspended, go read your books before you say stuff.
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 6:45 PM
I'm afraid you have a few facts misaligned. Unless I've taken complete leave of my senses, Juan was never sent off by the ATP.
RocketQueen , 2/25/09 7:31 PM
"World No. 8 Gilles Simon labeled the testing protocol unfair, unrealistic and impractical. "
This is not true, I have no idea why Simon is regularly mentioned as one of the players who are against the system. He gave again an interview lately where he very clearly states that he approves of the system, on the contrary. He seemed eager to clarify it. Tsonga finds it annoying, but Simon is all for it.
Francoise , 2/25/09 7:56 PM
rocketwench you're on drugs JUAN MONACO was banned for krell in 2005!!! go look it up lazy
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 8:04 PM
and to the poster above me, you're as bad as rocketwench!! simon plus murray and nadal called the wada crap harrassment. he never was all for something putting restrictions on a schedule nobody could keep. another lazy arse you are go read some other articles!
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 8:09 PM
Dear, is it possible you are confusing Juan with Mariano Puerta? Mariano was sent off in 2004 and 2005, not Juan. Juan has never been in trouble with these sorts of things.
RocketQueen , 2/25/09 8:25 PM
no
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 8:29 PM
juan was never suspended. Though I highly doubt trixxy will believe it anyways lol
orion , 2/25/09 8:33 PM
Thank you Orion. LOL. Trixxy, I did as you asked me to do and I ran over all the available information. I am eyes deep in the Wiki page [sorry for using such a trite reference here] and all I see is a mention of Mariano Puerta, Guillermo Coria, Juan Ignacio Chela, and Guillermo Canas.
Are you able to provide a link for Juan?
RocketQueen , 2/25/09 8:46 PM
http://www.topix.com/tennis/juan-monaco don't say i did nothing for you lazy arses!
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 8:57 PM
I give up with you dear, I see nothing but a collection of articles and a biopic of Juan. LOL. Cheers.
RocketQueen , 2/25/09 9:36 PM
monaco got lumped into that group five years ago with nalbandian and acasuso. get some glasses an go look again!!
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 10:27 PM
Ever heard of Chris Benoit? Pro wrestler killed his family, then himself. He was taking anabolic steroids. They can never be allowed in any sport!
Rafterfan , 2/25/09 10:59 PM
i heard of that crazy freak. thing is they can be fine if the person knows what they're doing. benoit lost it on account of being a nutburger first and cycling abombs ain't that bad if you got a clue. some of the tennis guys have to do it to keep up with they players who are better than they are. bodybuilders have used the stuff for years and years and years and they're fine.
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 11:14 PM
@trixxyfest: here's a link about Simon where he very clearly says that he's all for it:
http://www.lequipe.fr/Tennis/breves2009/20090218_020510_simon-fav orable-aux-controles.html
Francoise , 2/25/09 11:36 PM
Oh my dear, I might suggest you rethink that position. Anabolic steroids are very, very dangerous. There are many stories similiar to that of Chris Benoit, where a gentleman was stable before taking them only to muddle through psychiatric conditions later. They should not be allowed for anyone in any situation.
RocketQueen , 2/25/09 11:36 PM
That's not what is in the article which is in FRENCH you idiot. He said it was constraining and that nobody came up with a better solution. He also said that he doesn't agree with the penalities he'd get if he had problems with his schedule. Nice try stupid!!!!!!!
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 11:42 PM
@rocketwench nah you're wrong as usual. if somebody's got a clue how to use the stuff and gets it clean from someone, none of that bunk krell the cholos try to panhandle,,then it's all good. you know nothing about it on account of being scared from that far right witchhunt from 20 years ago.
trixxyfest , 2/25/09 11:48 PM
Sorry trixxy, but one cannot ignore harsh example after harsh example. My command of these sorts of things may surprise you, I know a bit more than you think. True as it might be there are examples of sportspeople who have escaped unscathed, more have not. You are condoning the use of poisons, afterall.
RocketQueen , 2/26/09 1:32 AM
ain't poison when it helps you win rocketwench. clear you never competed for anything before, otherwise ya know that without me telling you.
trixxyfest , 2/26/09 2:05 AM
Hello- I'm not sure how or where the rumor started, but Juan Monaco was never banned for doping. Trust me, I'm up on a lot of Argentine-related info. :)
Chris Benoit- I met him twice- was known to indulge in some...activities, so to speak. It was common knowledge among the other performers that he came into the business a little off center. His decision to cycle added to the problem and had catastrophic results.
Kelli , 2/26/09 3:46 AM
Well, it's a Kelli blog, so I was fully expecting the entire point of her article to be missed in favor of picking out a few sentences here and there and disagreeing with them.
I wasn't disappointed.
As for the article at hand, Kelli, you are spot on once again with everything. Bravo, and I look forward to Part 2.
JohnnyM , 2/26/09 3:51 AM
Why don't you correct the part about Simon, Kelli, if you've read the comments? I provided a link where he clearly says he doesn't disapprove of the system at all. He never says it's "unfair, unrealistic and impractical". I've always seen say the opposite in French, on the contrary. Or can you clarify what you're referring to when you mention Simon in that matter?
Francoise , 2/26/09 3:15 PM
Thanks Amorcito, much appreciated. Part 2 will probably get me run out of town on a rail...although that's happened before since we've known each other, no? ;)
Francoise- please remember to inform readers to remove the space contained within your link, otherwise it will not work.
Simon is among the players who have spoken out about the stringent nature of the testing. He did not make a fuss about testing proper (he said he has no problem with doing drops on a regular basis), but rather the sterile way WADA has proposed it be done. Hence the term "protocol" instead of- Simon says this method sucks.
RQ- when you arrive later today....dangerous chemicals/poisons yes, but I think he was talking about what's expected in non-traditional sports.
Kelli , 2/26/09 4:21 PM
why didn't ya answer about your use of krell in the post? someone must be SCARED!!!!!!!!!!
trixxyfest , 2/26/09 5:31 PM
The Fifth Estate tv program (similar US 60 Minutes) aired a documentary last year on a theory that has gained much factual support ... that implicates multiple concussions in the death of some pro-wrestlers and other pros in some other sports (American Football). The main case detailed in it was Chris Benoit. This is not to condone the use of drugs, but it seems that in his case and that of many others, brain autopsies and behavioral evidence seems to suggest that it was multiple concussions that were the main source of his behavior. For example, the autopsy revealed a brain comparable to an 85 year old man with dementia. This is a controversial topic... not because of lack of serious evidence... but because of its implications to the risks inherent in sports such as pro wrestling and football - even if they were entirely drug free - and what this might mean to the mega dollar industries they fuel.
chlorostoma , 2/26/09 5:40 PM
Yes dear, I understand what he meant but I have not changed my position a jot. Forgive any toes I may step on with you, but any drug use is diabolical no matter the stage. Some of the gentlemen you know might well have chosen a different profession before leeching poison out of every orifice they had.
If I may, I'd like to nominate cholorostoma for the best post honour. Gratitude for such thoughtful sharing, dear. So sad was that man's ending, and I myself wondered if there might be a connection between head injuries and erratic behaviour. Cheers.
RocketQueen , 2/26/09 7:03 PM
Thank you, RocketQueen
I chanced upon that doc on tv last year and it was very sad to watch.
For those who are interested just google Chris Benoit and concussions, and you'll find the transcript. In a word, many pro wrestlers, boxers, NFL pros, and others suffer multiple concussions ... and in the case of a *small* number of them this leads to severe depression, suicide attempts and other behavior now linked to brain tissue damage rather than drugs. This is more the case recently as the athletes are bigger and in the case of wrestling they fall on each other from greater heights (from ladders!) so the forces are much larger than in the past. The NFL has stated they would conduct their own studies.
chlorostoma , 2/26/09 7:34 PM
We cause trouble wherever we go? Listen, you obviously haven't trained hard to play this game. The serve is a complex shot, to be a good server requires work.
samprallica , 2/27/09 12:10 AM
what's so complex about serving? an idiot like roddick or a mug like karlovic is born with a loose elbow and they blast tennis balls out of a tree.
trixxyfest , 2/27/09 12:46 AM
samprallica- her point is she finds it boring to watch matches that are full of serve winners without quality rallies; she doesnt say anything about how important having a good serve is.
orion , 2/27/09 3:00 PM
TrixxyFest -
Just to muddy the waters a little, any comments/thoughts on the item published in the rumors sheets after the AO?:
?Which international tennis star tested positive for steroids recently but got away with it when his sportswear sponsor paid a ?hush money? donation to his national tennis association?? Feb 2009
tenisbebe , 2/27/09 3:26 PM
didn't see anything after the ao, but who are you talking about? gotta be nadal again~~! lololol the docs turn the other way if some guy's shootting hgh into his body.
trixxyfest , 2/27/09 5:39 PM
yeah orion, but she doesn't have to use terms to describe players who had great serves, yes greater than Roddick could dream of having.
samprallica , 2/27/09 6:52 PM
Rocketqueen, I'm a new blogger here so please forgive some serious brown nosing , but I just love your style of writing, it is so wry and witty...and I totally agreed with what you said about Sampras too.
As for the "angry sprite" isn't that what you called him, a certain overuse of exclamation marks etc etc cannot disgiuse the fact that he(?- who knows what games are played on the net..) certainly is well informed.
deuce , 2/27/09 6:53 PM
TrixxyFest
The item didn't mention Nadal per se but he is the obvious choice. This is worrisome as these "rag sheets" rarely mention anything/one tennis-related - they stick to Hollywood-type celebs. I don't mean to upset the Nadal fans, of which I count myself,but one wants to know. As I'm sure you know, there has been alot of "talk" about these 150 unreleased names on the sealed list obtained in Operation Puerto and some have contented that they have seen the list and his name is on it. People in the "know" about these things (not I) have sited epo, hgh and/or blood doping as likely but not steroids. Since you seem up on these things, wanted to get your take. Hopefully haven't spoiled Kelli's Part Two.......
tenisbebe , 2/27/09 7:29 PM
holy @#$^#$ i knew it!!!!! i said to a buddy of mine nadal got ahold of hgh. no test can pick it up yet on account of it being a natural substance but the guy is on it no doubt. so he gets it, but people are paid off bc they make tons of cash off him. none of this comes as a surprise to me, i'd have put my own cash on him spiking his blood with it.
trixxyfest , 2/27/09 7:50 PM
Greetings deuce! Not in the least, I'd say it was a rather kind thing of you to say. LOL. I regret I cannot stay long this evening other than for a lightning quick moment. I do tease trixxy and samprallica a bit when the mood strikes, so take their words lightly and have a nice time here. Welcome to a shiny new blogger, cheers dear!
RocketQueen , 2/27/09 8:20 PM
Yes, well, all speculation and conjecture at this point, but somewhat damning from the circumstantial "evidence" I've heard. If true, this will go very bad for him when it's revealed, and we always find out in the end, don't we (aka Bonds, A-Rod, etc) when the testing catches up. His reputation would be destroyed, never mind that of tennis. I pray it's just vicious gossip but time will tell. Please keep me posted if you "hear" anything. I will set up an "outside" e-mail address and post it to you later.
tenisbebe , 2/27/09 8:24 PM
flake off rocketwench the adults are speaking now, go and drool on your safin posters. go (&^(*%^*%$ing figure that it'ts gotta be bonds, a-roid and nadal. betcha pat cash is pretty pissed right about now knowing he lost that match to a juiced up 14 year old kid.
trixxyfest , 2/27/09 8:52 PM
TrixxyFest:
14 seems a little young to be juicing but anything's possible I suppose. Anyway, didn't know abut this match vs Cash. Will look on YouTube.
FYI:
tenisbebe@live.com
tenisbebe , 2/27/09 9:23 PM
Funny how the most honest personalities in sport end up cheating. But I still feel Rafa is above cheating.
samprallica , 3/2/09 8:18 PM
I don't think Nadal is on steroids but I think he eat half a buffalo every day and he is definitely not cheating because he plays by the 'rule'. Rule say you have 30 seconds between points and he spends 29.9 seconds adjusting his underpants, so he's not cheating. No rules against making so much noise through the nose everytime you hit the tennis ball so of course Nadal is not cheating.
torres9 , 3/2/09 10:26 PM
Everyone has their own mannerisms in the court. Rafa has so many but he's not denying them and as he said, it's UP TO THE UMPIRE to decide what's fault and what's not.
Grunting is not exclusive to Rafa, it's like acting,,, some are restrained ,others are hysterical.
That makes Rafa a very exciting character in tennis... NOT BORING like the others (should I mention the name?)
agf25agf , 3/3/09 10:05 PM
Tennis stat gurus quoting the "rag Sheets"... Come on. Are you all on drugs?
and Nadal is a huge celeb, have you not been to a Rafa drool site?
Drugs are bad. and if we okay them the drug Co.s move in.
smr , 3/4/09 4:47 AM
I was waiting rather cautionlly the 2nd part trying to buid in my mind my oppinion defence. But it's so loooooon already...
Kell, dear, where are you :awww:
acionescu , 3/10/09 5:45 PM
Where is Part 2?
cobalt60 , 4/12/09 3:17 PM
C'mon, whens the next blog coming?
daninaidu , 7/7/09 12:03 PM
r9NxK2 <a href="http://qxznhcwhigpc.com/">qxznhcwhigpc</a>, [url=http://szqcybljbfns.com/]szqcybljbfns[/url], [link=http://ifarfvsljety.com/]ifarfvsljety[/link], http://hsgaispsgwiq.com/
kuleshs , 7/14/10 6:30 AM
Wed 03/03 21:38
Challenger Tour players can’t get laid
Wed 24/02 21:21
Naked ambition part 2: Nadal vs. Shakira
Thu 06/08 15:32
The X-Factor: Rafa in the raw
Thu 23/07 11:18
Federer still waiting on launch of ATP-TV
Wed 15/07 10:13
The Lost Boys: tennis talent gone AWOL
Tue 07/07 23:43
ATP dope and dollars (Part Two)
Wed 25/02 15:09
ATP dope and dollars (Part One)
Mon 16/02 11:01
The 21st century feminization of men's tennis
Fri 06/02 00:39
Safin's swan song
Sat 31/01 12:16
Does Djokovic owe the ATP?
Wed 21/01 23:20
"El Gato" Gaudio returns, ready to scratch your itch
Sun 18/01 03:40
Novak in no-man's land
Wed 14/01 00:00
Hello, Helfant, you're hired!
Fri 09/01 11:20
Nike vs. Nadal: blowing up a brand
Mon 05/01 16:51
Monday mailbox: Got Gulbis?
View all posts
Scan QR code to access Unibet mobile.
Bet on Sports wherever you are and whenever you like, with Unibet's quick and simple mobile client you can place bets, check results and see live odds.
For more info about QR codes & scanners click here.
Amen.
chlorostoma , 2/25/09 3:24 PM