Help
2008-02-18 15:32:00
So, I've been reading a lot about Rafael Nadal and his relative tennis failings lately... And really, it's the time of year for it, right? The clay season and Wimbledon seem a distant memory. The Nadal we know right now is Hard Court Nadal. You know the one I'm talking about. He's the guy who seems to win matches because he simply refuses to lose them, not because he's playing better than the other guys.
It's an annual tradition now. The question must be asked - why can't Rafa win regularly on hard courts? Reputable tennis journalists the world over cannot resist trying to answer it, and to my amusement, their hypotheses get more and more creative each year. In one theory, he loses because he is too stubborn. If he would just, they claim, step into the court all of his problems would be solved. Forget the fact that his big back swing requires more time to set up and that if he stepped in he would be shanking balls left and right. He's just being stubborn. Check. Another, far more entertaining theory, involves a complex relationship that Nadal has with the sun and warm weather. The crux of the idea being that Nadal doesn't play well in overcast conditions. Which would certainly explain why he struggles during the gloom(??) of Cincinnati and New York.
I readily admit that this topic fascinates me also. Not because I need an explanation of why Rafael Nadal historically struggles at certain tournaments while excelling at others. That much I've deduced on my own after watching him over these last three or four years. He needs three things in order for his game to be at it's most effective: time, a high bouncing court, and if possible a slippery surface. Considering Nadal's considerable skill, any two of the three will usually do the trick for him. The further he is from those ideals, the worse his results tend to be.
No, what fascinates me is why these reputable tennis journalists feel the need to come up with explanations in the first place. Nobody pondered why Guillermo Coria only won one hard court title in his career - we KNOW why. He was/is a clay courter. Enough said. Since Nadal is inarguably one of the best clay courters of all time, can't we just accept the same for him? It seems not. But WHY can't we?
I'm sure answers are as varied and numerous as Roger Federer's shot repertoire, but I suspect it has at least something to do with the fact that Rafael Nadal finds ways to win when he "shouldn't". We've become accustomed to his falling back on his determination to pull him through when his skill alone won't get the job done. And every time his will fails him, there is a sense of disappointment. And another round of questions. Why, Rafa?
Tell a friend »
he has won a few hardcourt titles and also made the finals of a few hardcourt tournaments so I fail to understand how people can still think that Nadal can't win on hardcourts. That's like saying Federer can't win on clay.
sheila , 4/13/08 2:51 AM
I agree with you, sheila....but they DO think that. It is no secret that Nadal struggles during the summer hardcourt swing, but he's exhausted from playing all of may and june and the courts are much faster in Canada and Cincy. But just watch - come US Open time, everyone is going to say "Rafa is just no good on hard courts".
cherylmurray , 4/13/08 5:04 AM
Rafa has proven that he can win on ALL surfaces regardless of Roger. He's just 21 and barely starting to equal the BEST in tennis. In spite of that, he has had good results in hard courts, consistently in the semis of MASTERS hard court tournaments. He can't be forever winning on clay, and can't always be JUST finalist on hard surfaces.
agf25agf , 4/16/08 1:16 AM
We love to hear from you. Comments or concerns? Contact Cheryl at cheryl.murray [AT] tennistalk.com....
Thu 06/11 09:00
Top ten "what were they thinking" moments in 2008 Part II
Mon 03/11 15:09
Top ten "what were they thinking" moments in 2008 Part I
Fri 31/10 13:49
Andy Murray, new "it" boy
Thu 09/10 08:33
I don't miss Andre Agassi anymore
Fri 05/09 20:45
Next time, think BEFORE you speak, Nole
Wed 03/09 23:25
Rafael Nadal makes it easy to cheer for opponents
Mon 18/08 17:38
Federer and Nadal - Is it love, hate or something else entirely - Part 2
Fri 08/08 08:51
Federer and Nadal - Is it love, hate or something else entirely - Part 1
Tue 05/08 16:43
Roger Federer haunted by the Wimbledon ghost
Thu 24/07 16:23
Day two in Toronto - how my day was nearly ruined
Tue 22/07 19:58
Day one in Toronto - ATP players are pigs
Tue 08/07 17:43
Rafael Nadal the grass court god - who would have guessed
Fri 27/06 16:53
Nadal wins, Djokovic loses and Federer debuts THE SWEATER
Tue 10/06 17:22
Rafael Nadal, the clay court god
Tue 13/05 15:45
Federer Focusing on the Grand Slams
View all posts
Did you know that... Ivo Karlovic and Joachim Johansson shares the record of most aces (51) in a match.
janhavi, Nov 20, 2008 2:41 PM
janhavi, Nov 20, 2008 2:14 PM
gordana, Nov 20, 2008 11:28 AM
james007, Nov 20, 2008 8:03 AM
janhavi, Nov 20, 2008 4:04 AM
janhavi, Nov 20, 2008 5:15 PM
tennisfan2, Nov 12, 2008 4:24 AM
elle, Nov 10, 2008 2:11 AM
Contact us
/ About us
/ Cookies
/ Recommended links
/ Advertise
/ Sitemap
Tennistalk v1.3.0
Subscribe to this blog
because he's been more than a "just clay-courter" throughout these years and being world no.2 for three consecutive years,it's natural that people will surprise when he loses.isn't it?
sisterofnight12 , 3/23/08 3:48 PM